Monday, January 30, 2012

Does anyone think the media is exaggerating the whole Clinton-Obama race for ratings?

The news networks have recieved record-breaking ratings regarding potical coverage over the past two months. Obama has won the last 11 primary elections. In many of the contests he won by over 60%. Based on the momentum of the previous contests, Obama should be a shoe-in for the Democratic nominee. Over the past week the media has been getting increasingly negative on the Obama campaign. Is this all in an effort to protect ratings and ensure that the democratic primary contests continue? Let's face it, this contest is good for ratings.Does anyone think the media is exaggerating the whole Clinton-Obama race for ratings?wait a minute here..I am in total agreement about the media being about ratings, but for you to play Obama off as the victim is downright ridiculous. Obama has enjoyed good publicity until now because the media is afraid of offending somebody, by bringing up his past. You appear to be a Obama cult member so it most likely doesnt matter what anybody else says or does, but that man, his past, his associates and his ways are very scary. And, the same media you talk so bad about, is the same media that has helped him create all of this hype. I think it is very possible that he is the devil here to ruin the Earth. You, like alot of people are mesmerized by his eloquent speeches about nothing and the hoopla. Use your brain and not your heart please, this man is the scariest individual that this country has ever seen. His intentions are not admirable, please wake up.|||It their job to do so,Does anyone think the media is exaggerating the whole Clinton-Obama race for ratings?They wanna keep it going as long as possible i am sure. Let the advertising dollars roll in|||YES!



I think the MEDIA has all but destroyed the credibility of BOTH Obama and Clinton the way they have totally entertained the idea of them fighting and bullying Etc....it HAS hurt the Democratic party overallDoes anyone think the media is exaggerating the whole Clinton-Obama race for ratings?The only media I've seen getting negative on the Obama campaign is Saturday Night Live. Disregarding the media treatment of the race however, I wouldn't say Obama is a shoe-in for the nomination. True, he has won 11 primaries straight. But he's lost a lot of big primaries, and until recently, was expected to lose Ohio and Texas, also big primaries. I'd say the race is still really close. Obama is what? 120 delegates up? And they're both about 700-800 delegates away from clinching the nomination. It's a tight race, with or without Obama momentum.|||the media ,like politicians , is corrupt and crooked. They try to sway how you and I vote . I ignore the fools and listen to the politician and try to look beyond there lies, and I go with the most favorable lie that will benefit America.

In this elction , however we have no good candidates now that Ron Paul is gone, so I have to vote for Huckabee. These two will fight back against the IRS and fight to help us keep our constitutional rights|||Of course they are..why wouldn't they. The media is feeding off this democrat race like crazy and the people enjoy it. They don't want to see two candidates being nice to each other and how good people are...so the media shows them what they want to see and thats this new-age, very interesting race.|||I think the media chose Clinton and Obama to run.|||You got it.

No comments:

Post a Comment